Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery is a widely accepted principle; recommendations have been based on laboratory studies and numerous clinical trials published in the last 25 years. In practice, single-dose prophylaxis has not been universally accepted and multiple-dose regimens are still used in some centres. Moreover, the principle has recently been challenged by the results of an Australian study of vascular surgery. The aim of this current systematic review is to determine the overall efficacy of single versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery and across surgical disciplines. METHODS Relevant studies were identified in the medical literature using the MEDLINE database and other search strategies. Trials included in the review were prospective and randomized, had the same antimicrobial in each treatment arm and were published in English. Rates of postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) were extracted, 2 x 2 tables prepared and odds ratios (OR) [with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] calculated. Data were then combined using fixed and random effects models to provide an overall figure. In this context, a high value for the combined OR, with 95% CI > 1.0, indicates superiority of multiple-dose regimens and a low OR, with 95% CI < 1.0, suggests the opposite. A combined OR close to 1.0, with narrow 95% CI straddling 1.0, indicates no clear advantage of one regimen over another. Further subgroup analyses were also performed. RESULTS Combined OR by both fixed (1.06, 95% CI, 0.89-1.25) and random effects (1.04, 95% CI, 0.86-1.25) models indicated no clear advantage of either single or multiple-dose regimens in preventing SSI. Likewise, subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences associated with type of antimicrobial used (beta-lactam vs other), blinded wound assessment, length of the multiple-dose arm (> 24 h vs 24 h or less) or type of surgery (obstetric and gynaecological vs other). CONCLUSIONS Continued use of single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery is recommended. Further studies are required, especially in previously neglected surgical disciplines.
منابع مشابه
Effect of single-dose intravenous ibuprofen before surgery on post-anesthesia pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: During the last few years, the trend of using non-opioid drugs for the management of pain after surgery has been highly welcomed, and on the other hand, considering the contradictory results of the preventive use of intravenous ibuprofen before surgery, the present study aimed at the effect of a single dose of intravenous ibuprofen before surgery. A systematic review and meta-anal...
متن کاملEditorial: Antibiotic prophylaxis for hip fracture surgery: three-dose cefuroxime versus single-dose gentamicin and amoxicillin.
in orthopaedic practice. In this issue, Jettoo et al.1 investigated issues related to (1) single versus multiple doses of antibiotic prophylaxis, (2) adverse effects of multiple dosing, and (3) choice of an appropriate antibiotic. In an attempt to address the concomitant problems of cefuroxime-resistant pathogens and Clostridium difficile infections, the authors’ hospital changed the antibiotic...
متن کاملAntimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery The contents of this bulletin are likely to be valid for around one year, by which time significant new research evidence may have become available. s Antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective for the prevention of surgical wound infections in colorectal surgery and should be used. s No 'gold standard' regimen can be identified. There is no differenc...
متن کاملAntimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery The contents of this bulletin are likely to be valid for around one year, by which time significant new research evidence may have become available. s Antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective for the prevention of surgical wound infections in colorectal surgery and should be used. s No 'gold standard' regimen can be identified. There is no differenc...
متن کاملCeftriaxone versus vancomycin prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery.
The efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery was compared between 97 patients receiving a single 2 g dosage of ceftriaxone and 103 receiving 500 mg of vancomycin i.v. every 6 h for 48 h. The overall infection rate was 13.4% in the ceftriaxone and 10.7% in the vancomycin group. Four (4%) wound infections, including one mediastinitis, occurred in the ceftriaxone group and five (5%) i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery
دوره 68 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998